Boxing and The First Amendment
By Martin Wade
I have bad news to announce boxing
fans; from the looks of Max Kellermans “Face Off” and the first episode of 24/7
Floyd Mayweather won’t be saying anything that challenges your humanity. Miguel
Cotto is just too damned worthy of Floyd's respect as a fighter and more
importantly as a man, there’s nothing in his “story” that will attract Floyd to
cross the line-this may be a much needed departure for Floyd’s pastor but
boring for the sycophants. In the meantime many of us are either counting the
days until the NBA play-offs or listening to the grainy Gregg Williams audio
encouraging violent men to be violent. Mind you his words led to an ass kicking
courtesy the San Francisco 49’ers but it was the “intent” that on many levels
have many “thoughtful” fans who scream for murder on Sunday to question the
assistant coaches “morals”. Or just maybe you’ve dined on the Ozzie Guillan
apology press conference where he expressed remorse (to Miami’s Cuban elite)
for the dumbass “big ups” he gave to Fidel Castro. While the hypocrisy is
filling my throat like a room with no windows and Snoop Dog I think about the
Right to Free Speech and how our “sport” in some ways function within the true
spirit of the First amendment.
For Better or Worse.
Like most people with
nothing to lose there’s a true liberty and ability to play it fast and loose
when nobody gives a damn about you. A speech like the one Gregg Williams made
(to the Saints Defense) is not only tame but low functioning in a sport like
ours, where the sole object is to injure the man across the ring from you.
Essentially what he “suggested” is put in even more graphic terms between every
round of every fight witnessed by viewers; hence there is no sponsor funded
delusion about what it is your watching on HBO. When Boxers or those associated
with Boxing say something that may not be politically incorrect our more
civilized brethren simply shrug and say “of course, it’s boxing”. While whiny
ex athletes line up to tell Skip Bayless he hurt their feelings boxing is an
arena where feelings are the LAST thing to get hurt.
Investigator to Ray Robinson
at 1947 Jimmy Doyle manslaughter hearing: When did you (Robinson) know you had
him in trouble?
Robinson: “They pay me to
get him in Trouble”
Martin Wade 2012: "Only a
Boxer can say some shit like this".
Football Players, even the
borderline convicts have to put on an appropriate face despite a work
environment that is rooted in violence, homophobia and all manner of social
debauchery. Dan Lebatard, Miami columnist while speaking about the recent pro
Castro Ozzie Guillen statements put it best when he said “ if you’re gonna
offend someone pick on someone with a poor advocacy group”. Howard Bryant
called the Guillen situation a matter of “audience” not speech, Guillen would
fit right in with Boxing. Boxing fans are nearly impossible to offend and even
when we are we never take the next step because somewhere deep in our subconscious
we know that the sport we love (legalized assault) is at its core offensive.
We’ve yet to make the consumer connection between “withholding of goods and
services’ and the Mayweather/Pacquiao debacle; that we pay subscription fees to
entities that cannot guarantee us a “Super Bowl” in any division. Words can’t
offend us because we’ve been bludgeoned into a perpetual state of
desensitization -we’re numb to them because punches hold the real power.
Asian American advocacy
groups went after the ESPN anchor that used Jeremy Lins name in stereotypical
word puns and ignored “world famous” Floyd Mayweather. Why? Because ESPN and
their corporate sponsors pay millions to stay above the fray and Floyd
Mayweather is only financially tied to the IRS, his Children, and Sports
Betting websites. Mayweather (episode 1, 24/7) even used a dogfighting analogy
and dared PETA to confront him because “ima rock my mink coats”, but the people
at PETA are big game hunters and Floyd (to them) is a corporate Welterweight. Even
Larry Merchant can threaten to kick Mayweathers ass on live TV with no repercussions,
can you imagine an NFL anchor expressing a clear negative bias towards a team
or athlete? Would the NBA who (with kudos from black journalists) enforced a
dress-code for the comfort of Corporate fat cats in the wine and cheese section
allow an on air anchor to say what he really thinks of the baller formally
known as Ron Artest? Freedom of speech is not immunity from consequences,
especially when that speech interferes with somebodies money. In Boxing when
PPV sales are weak you can count on inflammatory speech to drive the ‘buys” up
in the week before a fight. Like pantomime theatre Bernard Hopkins tells an
assembled media that no “white boy” will ever whip his ass, but the cynic in me
believes he played the race card because it’s one of the few remaining dog
whistles in the sport.
What would have tested the
bounds of Free Speech is Naseem Hamed had he made an honest effort to avenge
his April 2001 loss to Marco Antonio Barrera. Already an obnoxious lightning
rod the well paid featherweight was known to express his Islamic faith after
each and every fight. America was bloodthirsty back then and Islamaphobia was
just starting to kick in after the atrocity of 9/11, had Hamed turned the
tables on Barrera in the spring of 2002 we would have probably witnessed the
most despised Boxer since a Vietnam draft era Muhammad Ali. By the way we owe a
lot of our wiggle room to Muhammad Ali who covered more ground (as an active
boxer) than most Politicians. He even made it possible for promoters and media
types to flex their blowhard muscles and say whatever the hell they wanted
during the buildup to major fights. In a lot of ways we are all verbally
inheritors and the “Children of Ali”.
No comments:
Post a Comment